Deb Ryan, host of Navigating Carbon Podcast with Bryan Ross, Global Account Executive for Envana Software Solutions - December 2024
One of the critical topics for oil and gas companies Deb and Bryan discussed were the challenges operators face accounting for GHG throughout the value chain all the way to LNG.
In the past, methane emissions were calculated based on generalized emission factors and publicly available methodologies to estimate leaks and fugitive emissions. But what the industry has realized is that directly measuring, finding leaks, and quantifying is a more appropriate way to calculate methane emissions, aligned with the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership. For companies working toward OGMP 2.0 Levels 4 and 5, the challenges with methane emissions involve identifying the most material assets to measure directly, the required frequency, what to do with the data, uncertainty, and more.
Bryan explained the value of implementing an LDAR (leak detection and repair) program, creating a centralized platform to operationalize and visualize the data, and making informed calculations, contextualizing what the leak rates mean in the overall methane footprint.
One of the biggest hurdles international companies face is reporting emissions amidst constantly changing requirements. This becomes more complex when companies need to report a carbon footprint across several geographical jurisdictions with different reporting factors as well as voluntary frameworks. Most of the systems used today such as in-house spreadsheets are very manual and error-prone. Using a centralized platform to visualize all the data in one place, accounting for such differences helps ease the burden.
Scope 3 emissions reporting is becoming increasingly important. Per Bryan, the requirement to report Scope 3 this year only applied for companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and some Asian stock exchanges. Now, the Carbon Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is also adding Scope 3 reporting requirements on European companies.
The most interesting challenge Envana has seen is on the upstream operations side, with many vendors contributing to well operations. The operators' procurement and supply chain management teams are starting to exert pressure on vendors to report emissions and select lower carbon options.
For downstream, most of the pressure comes from companies offering carbon-neutral fuels like blue ammonia or blue hydrogen, where it's important to quantify emissions from a site-to-site basis, tying these to a carbon product footprint, and allowing to deduct any offsets to show a carbon-neutral distribution when they export that gas to a different country.
It's becoming a bigger pressure now as the European Union will start requiring exporters of gas to the E.U. to report on methane intensity by 2027, affecting Trinidad and Tobago, West Africa, U.S., East Canada, and Latin America exporters.
Reach out to Envana to find out more about how we are helping world-class leaders efficiently meet their GHG goals and how we can help your organization too. Tell us about your carbon accounting challenges. Most likely, we'll be able to support you in solving your emissions reporting challenges with solutions that will benefit your bottom line and help mitigate your risks.
To listen to the podcast, visit Navigating Carbon.